Using quantile regression for fitting lactation curve in dairy cows
نویسنده:
, , , , , , , , ,سال
: 2019
چکیده: The main objective of this study was to compare the performance of different ‘nonlinear
quantile regression’ models evaluated at the τth quantile -0·25, 0·50, and 0·75- of milk production
traits and somatic cell score -SCS- in Iranian Holstein dairy cows. Data were collected by
the Animal Breeding Center of Iran from 1991 to 2011, comprising 101 051 monthly milk
production traits and SCS records of 13 977 cows in 183 herds. Incomplete gamma
-Wood-, exponential -Wilmink-, Dijkstra and polynomial -Ali & Schaeffer- functions were
implemented in the quantile regression. Residual mean square, Akaike information criterion
and log-likelihood from different models and quantiles indicated that in the same quantile,
the best models were Wilmink for milk yield, Dijkstra for fat percentage and Ali &
Schaeffer for protein percentage. Over all models the best model fit occurred at quantile
0·50 for milk yield, fat and protein percentage, whereas, for SCS the 0·25th quantile was
best. The best model to describe SCS was Dijkstra at quantiles 0·25 and 0·50, and Ali &
Schaeffer at quantile 0·75. Wood function had the worst performance amongst all traits.
Quantile regression is specifically appropriate for SCS which has a mixed multimodal
distribution.
quantile regression’ models evaluated at the τth quantile -0·25, 0·50, and 0·75- of milk production
traits and somatic cell score -SCS- in Iranian Holstein dairy cows. Data were collected by
the Animal Breeding Center of Iran from 1991 to 2011, comprising 101 051 monthly milk
production traits and SCS records of 13 977 cows in 183 herds. Incomplete gamma
-Wood-, exponential -Wilmink-, Dijkstra and polynomial -Ali & Schaeffer- functions were
implemented in the quantile regression. Residual mean square, Akaike information criterion
and log-likelihood from different models and quantiles indicated that in the same quantile,
the best models were Wilmink for milk yield, Dijkstra for fat percentage and Ali &
Schaeffer for protein percentage. Over all models the best model fit occurred at quantile
0·50 for milk yield, fat and protein percentage, whereas, for SCS the 0·25th quantile was
best. The best model to describe SCS was Dijkstra at quantiles 0·25 and 0·50, and Ali &
Schaeffer at quantile 0·75. Wood function had the worst performance amongst all traits.
Quantile regression is specifically appropriate for SCS which has a mixed multimodal
distribution.
شناسه الکترونیک: 10.1017/S0022029919000013
کلیدواژه(گان): quantile regression
کالکشن
:
-
آمار بازدید
Using quantile regression for fitting lactation curve in dairy cows
Show full item record
contributor author | حسین نعیمی پوریونسی | en |
contributor author | محمد مهدی شریعتی | en |
contributor author | سعید زره داران | en |
contributor author | مهدی جباری نوقابی | en |
contributor author | Peter Lovendahl | en |
contributor author | Hossein Naeemipour | fa |
contributor author | Mohammad Mahdi Shariati | fa |
contributor author | Saeed Zerehdaran | fa |
contributor author | Mehdi Jabbari Nooghabi | fa |
contributor author | Peter Lovendahl | fa |
date accessioned | 2020-06-06T13:44:19Z | |
date available | 2020-06-06T13:44:19Z | |
date issued | 2019 | |
identifier uri | http://libsearch.um.ac.ir:80/fum/handle/fum/3367081 | |
description abstract | The main objective of this study was to compare the performance of different ‘nonlinear quantile regression’ models evaluated at the τth quantile -0·25, 0·50, and 0·75- of milk production traits and somatic cell score -SCS- in Iranian Holstein dairy cows. Data were collected by the Animal Breeding Center of Iran from 1991 to 2011, comprising 101 051 monthly milk production traits and SCS records of 13 977 cows in 183 herds. Incomplete gamma -Wood-, exponential -Wilmink-, Dijkstra and polynomial -Ali & Schaeffer- functions were implemented in the quantile regression. Residual mean square, Akaike information criterion and log-likelihood from different models and quantiles indicated that in the same quantile, the best models were Wilmink for milk yield, Dijkstra for fat percentage and Ali & Schaeffer for protein percentage. Over all models the best model fit occurred at quantile 0·50 for milk yield, fat and protein percentage, whereas, for SCS the 0·25th quantile was best. The best model to describe SCS was Dijkstra at quantiles 0·25 and 0·50, and Ali & Schaeffer at quantile 0·75. Wood function had the worst performance amongst all traits. Quantile regression is specifically appropriate for SCS which has a mixed multimodal distribution. | en |
language | English | |
title | Using quantile regression for fitting lactation curve in dairy cows | en |
type | Journal Paper | |
contenttype | External Fulltext | |
subject keywords | quantile regression | en |
identifier doi | 10.1017/S0022029919000013 | |
journal title | Journal of Dairy Research | en |
journal title | Journal of Dairy Research | fa |
pages | 19-24 | |
journal volume | 86 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
identifier link | https://profdoc.um.ac.ir/paper-abstract-1073130.html | |
identifier articleid | 1073130 |