Show simple item record

contributor authorAfshin Amiraslanyen
contributor authorSuren Kulshreshthaen
contributor authorمحمد قربانیen
contributor authorMohammad Ghorbanifa
date accessioned2020-06-06T13:12:16Z
date available2020-06-06T13:12:16Z
date issued2012
identifier urihttp://libsearch.um.ac.ir:80/fum/handle/fum/3345756?show=full
description abstractThere are some criticizes on Contingent valuation method (CVM) and Travel cost method (TCM),

therefore many researchers have combined multiple methods of non-market valuation or have tried to value the

non-market goods or services by different methods and check for convergent validity of the methods. In this

paper both CVM and TCM are used. The empirical part showed that willingness to pay is more for New-Mexico

recreation sites based on a dichotomous choice sample obtained from the data set gathered by Hessaln et al.

In addition, fire age is shown to have less impact on WTP of visiting the sites in contingent valuation method.

This study showed the two estimates on willingness to pay calculated by TCM and CVM are not significantly

different at the 5% level.
en
languageEnglish
titleComparing the Economic Value of Fire Conditions and the Effects of Wildfire on Hiking in New-Mexico Recreation Sites using Contingent the Valuation Method and Travel Cost Methoden
typeJournal Paper
contenttypeExternal Fulltext
subject keywordsEnvironmental amenities Non-market valuation Travel Cost method Contingent valuation

method Recreation
en
journal titleAmerican-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Scien
journal titleAmerican-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciencefa
pages1196-1204
journal volume12
journal issue9
identifier linkhttps://profdoc.um.ac.ir/paper-abstract-1033801.html
identifier articleid1033801


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record